Land of the Dead and the Dying

An objective look at the disturbing truth through the lens of history could be the single most powerful weapon we have. By absorbing the lessons of history, humanity can prevent further servitude and maintain its liberty for another day.

The majority of people in the United States today are still technically free, but our enslavement and that of future generations is imminent. Political theater and the “so-called” free press manipulate and manage us.

Both of these pernicious institutions purport to give us a choice but supply none. Most of our ideological and social quandaries are really charades that have already been “acted out” yet continue undetected.

The example of pre-Soviet Russia, a powerful European nobility, and its terrifying descent into a communist killing field should still be relevant today. The protagonists’ motivations, predicaments, choices, and inevitable outcomes are all quite similar to today.

The Tsardom of Muscovy

The Tsardom of Muscovy, the first centralized Russia, was formed in 1547 and controlled by Tsar Ivan Vasilyevich, also known as Ivan the Terrible. Peter the Great established undisputed rule over the tsardom in 1689, and after defeating Sweden in 1721, named it the Russian Empire.

Imperial Russia

Prior to 1917, the Russian Empire was a rapidly expanding Christian nation controlled by royal dynasties, the most well-known of which was the Romanov family. During this time, most European countries were ruled by some type of nobility. The opportunities for the enormous and productive Russian state were limitless, rivaling the greatest of any other European empire.

In stark contrast to the fanatical personalities who would give rise to the Soviet Union, Tsar Nicholas the Second was a sophisticated leader with Western values. Nicholas was clearly not without flaws, but at his core, he was a loving family man and a patriotic countryman. In addition, unlike his authoritarian and deceitful predecessors, Nicholas would never have taken the throne if given the opportunity.

In the years preceding the Russian Empire’s terrible fall, the state had been penetrated by an anti-Russian organization of miscreants, planting the seeds of disillusionment. They falsely claimed to be revolutionaries fighting for the hardworking and underrepresented working class and its independence from the snobbish bourgeoisie.

The revolutionaries promised independence from the “tyrannical” Tsar and “peace, land, and bread,” all of which were desired by the majority of citizens across Europe at the time.

Bolsheviks, or death merchants, would finally consume the weak Russian Empire before excreting its grim replacement state, the Soviet Union.

The haunting execution of the Romanov’s

On the night of July 16th, 1918, following imprisonment and humiliating treatment, Nicholas and his family, were ordered to dress quickly and convene in the cellar for a portrait. Nicholas, Alexandria, their five children  Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia, and Alexei, along  with the servants huddled closely to be photographed.

At that moment Nicholas was informed of the execution and seconds after a group of cowardly Bolshevik assassins, led by a Jew, Yakov Yurovsky, proceeded to unload hot lead into the whimpering and cornered family. Nicholas’ last words were “What, What?”, and soon all but the Tsar, who received a blast through the skull, lay dying amidst the thick air of gun smoke.

The children and Alexandria, who were badly injured but still alive, endured another 20 minutes of bayonets and rifle butts until their mangled bodies stopped moving. Alexei Romanov, who was only 13 at the time and a hemophiliac, had suffered a most agonizing and gruesome demise.

After the frenzied and chaotic execution, the Romanov corpses would suffer a last humiliation by suffering postmortem abuse, being stripped of jewelry and clothes, and then doused in acid.

(There is a more comprehensive report of all the sadistic and disgusting treatment of the corpse on the internet, if you look in the right places. The accounts were unnecessarily disturbing and therefor omitted.)

The Soviet Union

The Bolshevik high ranks were not only thick disproportionately with Jew’s, but Lenin and Stalin, its two psychotic leaders were Jewish as well. This issue has been buried beneath an insurmountable amount of subterfuge, and that’s what makes it both terrifying and relevant.

Once the Lenin was the unequivocal authority of the Soviet Union, the real sadistic mayhem was unleashed, making the revolution’s mass casualties look inconsequential. The Russian people were promised equality, fairness, and a stake in the state, instead, they received unimaginable terror and subjugation.

Vladimir Lenin died on January 21, 1924, leaving Joseph Stalin as the explicit authority over the vast, Godless, slave-state known as the Soviet Union.

Land of the Dead and the Dying

Ukraine, which was in the Soviet Union then, would not be immune to immutable horrors, deemed necessary by Stalin and the Bolsheviks. In his initial “stab” at establishing the wholesome tenets of communism, Stalin would impose “collectivism” , which replaced individually owned and operated farms with big state-run collectives.

Many of the Ukrainian farming serfs resisted this wholesale seizure of their land and their main source of sustenance.

Holodomor

The term Holodomor refers to a period of time, 1932-1933 primarily, when Stalin’s policies of collectivism and its dire effects had come to a head, causing a man-made famine in Ukraine.

-holodomorct.org

1932-1933

Although starvation is already widely reported by officials to their superiors (but never in the press), the Soviet government sharply increases Ukraine’s production quotas, impossible to meet by a weakened and famished population.

Stalin observes in the summer of 1932 to his right hand commander, Lazar Kaganovich that “we may lose Ukraine,”  and proceeds to implement a number of laws to punish the farmers and threaten the collective farm managers. A law goes into effect that calls for the arrest or execution of any person – even a child — found taking as little as a few stalks of wheat or any possible food item from the fields where they worked. Travel voucher systems are implemented that forbid people from rural areas taking a train to the cities. In mid-winter, the borders are closed to residents of Ukraine, with armed guards forcing residents to return to their starving villages. Entire Ukrainian villages are “blacklisted,” a law that prohibits the transport of food and other necessities such as fuel or soap into the villages and the hungry from leaving in search of food. Brigades of young activists are brought in to sweep through the villages and confiscate hidden grain, and eventually any and all food from the farmers’ homes.

Stalin once stated that “the national question is in essence a rural question” Now he and his commanders determine to “teach a lesson through famine” and ultimately, to deal a “crushing blow” to the backbone of Ukraine, its rural population.  At the same time, he repeatedly lays blame on outside sab0teurs, kurkul influence, and weak collective farm management.  Thousands of low level, local communist managers are arrested for not squeezing more out their collective farmers.

1933

By June, at the height of the famine, people in Ukraine are dying at the rate of 28,000 a day, nearly a third of them are children under 10. Between 1932-34, approximately 4 million deaths are attributed to starvation within the borders of Soviet Ukraine. Stalin denies to the world that there is any famine in Ukraine, and continues to export millions of tons of grain, more than enough to have saved every starving man, woman and child.

In conclusion

The death toll and scope of Stalin’s genocidal actions far and away dwarf anything Hitler is accused of fomenting, yet we still chose to ally ourselves with the Stalin regime. The entire premise behind our heavy-handed invasion of Germany was to rebuke a psychotic despot and prevent a genocide. 

Until this day, there’s an immutable narrative applied to the Second World War and what led up to it. If you challenge this then you run the risk of being labeled an antisemite or white supremacist. Why are there certain issues or accounts in this country that you’re not allowed to question.

Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *